James and Julie Archambeault v Wyndham
Case Number: No. 3:20-cv-01044
Last Updated: May 29, 2023
Menu
Status
At issue, Bench Trial set for 8/23/22; pending ruling on Ps’ motion [59-1] for permission to file MPSJ re violations of TN Time-Share Act (failure to properly disclose rescission language) Pending ruling on Wyn MPO [52] re ps 30(b)(6) Depo notice
Location
TN MD
Presiding Judge
Judge Richardson
Date Filed
04/06/2018
Highlights
Timeshare Owners survived Wyndham’s motion for an order dismissing their breach of contract claim.
Case Posture
Claims:
Fraud, BOC, viol of TN Timeshare Act
Posture:
Voluntarily dismissed after execution of confidential settlement.
Summary:
Order denying Wyndham’s Motion to Dismiss Breach of Contract Claim
Order denying Ps’ motion [59-1] for permission to file MPSJ re violations of TN Time-Share Act (failure to properly disclose rescission language)
Order denying in part, granting in part Wyn MPO [52] re ps 30(b)(6) Depo notice
- Document Links
Click on the PDF titles below to view.
Docket link
Operative Complaint
Critical Orders
Critical Briefs
Transcripts
Click on the PDF titles above to view.
Parties
Plaintiffs:
James and Julie Archambeault
Plaintiffs’ counsel:
Aubrey Givens
Kristin Fecteau
Defendants:
Wyndham
Defendants’ counsel:
Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz
Sponsored by
Providing defense for timeshare exit companies and anti-SLAPP cases in California for over two decades. Learn more.
Game Changer Notifications
DISCLAIMER: We are not affiliated, associated, authorized, endorsed by, or in any way officially connected with any timeshare developer, or any of its subsidiaries or its affiliates. The names of any timeshare developer, attorney, and all parties involved as well as related names, marks, emblems, and images are registered trademarks of their respective owners. All names, logos, images, and brands are the property of their respective owners.
copyright © 2020 – 2023 Timeshare Law Library
Menu