Robert Barbu and Holly Herrick v Wyndham
Case Number: 3:2020-cv-01045
Last Updated: May 29, 2023
The timeshare owners’ claims of Wyndham sales representatives’ misrepresentations upon which they relied in purchasing their timeshare were specifically to survive motion to dismiss.
TN Timeshare Act survived Motion to Dismiss.
Settled
Dec. 9, 2021 Order [32] re M2D FAC denied re TN Timeshare Act, BOC (vol. dismissed): The purported misrepresentations [] are specific, are specifically attributable to [the sales agent], and were allegedly made on or about October 30, 2012 during the lengthy sales presentation that resulted in the plaintiffs’ signing a timeshare contract that day.
Click on the PDF titles below to view.
Click on the PDF titles above to view.
Plaintiffs:
Robert Barbu and Holly Herrick
Plaintiffs’ counsel:
(Aubrey Givens, then pro se)
Defendants:
Wyndham
Defendants’ counsel:
Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz
Providing defense for timeshare exit companies and anti-SLAPP cases in California for over two decades. Learn more.
DISCLAIMER: We are not affiliated, associated, authorized, endorsed by, or in any way officially connected with any timeshare developer, or any of its subsidiaries or its affiliates. The names of any timeshare developer, attorney, and all parties involved as well as related names, marks, emblems, and images are registered trademarks of their respective owners. All names, logos, images, and brands are the property of their respective owners.
By using this site and its services you agree to the Terms of Service of this site.
By continuing to use this site you agree to these Terms of Service and acknowledge that you understand that you are agreeing to binding legal terms.